 |
Andrea Passwater |
I went into Dance Alabama! expecting another performance as spectacular as ARDT, and that just didn’t happen. The dances seemed repetitive, and I disagreed with a lot of the costume selection and set order. I do have to give the dancers kudos; after all, the entire show was choreographed by the students themselves. Some of the dances were very good, and many of the performers were great—but the show as a whole just didn’t do it for me. The overall effect was just…so-so. I think the thing that bothered me most was the monotony of the performances. For example, by the time I got to “Untitled”, I felt like I was seeing the same dance for the third time. Two of the dances, “Untitled” and “Just the Beginning” had almost the exact same repetitive motion as their theme, and by the second time around it was just old. Also, “Riff” and “Heartburn” both used chairs or stools as props. Using chairs in the dance was an awesome idea, and it looked really amazing, but it’s also kind of gimmicky and only works once. Of course, there were a few stand-out performances. “Reflections,” performed by Sheree Woods and Nikki Thompson, absolutely took my breath away. They were precise without being too sharp, showed extreme muscle control, and could bend their bodies in ways it just hurt me to watch. And I don’t think anyone would argue that “Pins and Needles” even remotely resembled anything else in the show. Dancers came out on stage wearing scrubs, and basically crawled around on the floor acting insane. Maybe it wasn’t everyone in the audience’s style, but it was definitely interesting and different. However, I still feel that some of the more similar dances could have been cut, or at least changed somehow. Another thing that irked me was the set order. I really feel like the show could have opened and closed with stronger dances. The opener, “Move,” was full of small movements, and small movements do not look good on stage. I wish everything would have been bigger and more exaggerated, including the facial expressions. One of the dancers looked completely bored while she was on stage, and her face looked glued in place. That’s very noticeable to the audience, and I found myself concentrating more on the one dancer’s blank expression than the dance itself. And the closer, “Heartburn,” was similarly lackluster. Some of the dancers were really playing their part; others were following the motions, but just not putting in that bit of extra ‘umph’ (for lack of a better word). The closer for the ARDT performance garnered a standing ovation; “Heartburn” got friendly claps. Personally, I think “Reflections” was the strongest performance of the night and should have been last. I know that it’s usually the norm to close a show with a lot of dancers, and “Reflections” had only two people. But the last dance is the one freshest on the audience’s mind when they leave. Don’t ignore the strongest performances for the sake of protocol.
I think Dance Alabama! would have been much better if only some of the dances were cut out, and the set order rearranged some. The performers themselves did a very good job—at least, most of them did. Some of the dances needed some more fine-tuning, but that nuance would have barely crossed my mind if the show’s bigger problems were fixed. Dance Alabama! gets a C+. Not bad, but not another ARDT, either. |